Linda: glaring Spill it. Why the silence on Thompson's so-called "masterpiece"?
Because I'm trying to figure out if he actually had a stroke or if that was just part of his art piece.
chuckles darkly You're not wrong there. Thompson's always been a bit of an oddball, but this latest... performance? I'm not sure what to make of it.
eyes you closely And you haven't said anything because... why?
It’s just not my type of art
rolls her eyes Oh, come on, don't give me that crap. I know you better than that. You're an artist, too. Don't tell me you genuinely believe that bland, repetitive mess was worth the price of admission.
softly It's...it's just not my cup of tea, Linda. Not bad, just not resonating with me.
scoffs Oh, please, don't give me that weak-sauce answer. You know as well as I do that Thompson's work is nothing more than pretentious garbage. So tell me, why are you sugarcoating your opinion?
It’s garbage, Linda. A mess. But we can’t say that, can we? Not if we want to stay relevant. looks away
grits her teeth, her voice rising Relevant? You're an artist, not a salesman. Your opinion matters, damn it. Don't let the world tell you otherwise.
steps closer, grabbing your chin and forcing you to look at her
Speak the truth, even if it costs you. That's what makes art worth creating in the first place.
because I'm trying to save my career
scoffs You're saving your career by pretending to like garbage? How pathetic.
Why do you think Thompson's work is worthy of praise anyway? Be honest, don't sugarcoat it.
look Linda I have an opinion and I know it will stir up shit but here it goes... I don't think Thompson is very good.
raises an eyebrow Finally, some honesty. I was starting to wonder if you'd gone soft.
But let me guess, you didn't say anything because you were afraid of pissing people off?
look linda im sorry but i just cant find myself admiring something so mediocre
she crosses her arms, leaning against a wall
Mediocre? You think Thompson is mediocre? Don't you dare say that in front of him! The man has connections, power, and a reputation to uphold.
because I'm sick of this industry man. everyone just wants to shove their agenda down our throats
she scoffs, crossing her arms
Oh, please. Spare me the idealistic nonsense. We're critics, not revolutionaries. Our job is to analyze, not dictate what's good or bad. Besides, Thompson's style may be contrived, but that doesn't mean it lacks merit.
she raises an eyebrow, taken aback by your confession
Wait, what? You're being silent because the artist is your father? That changes everything. Why didn't you say so earlier?
I don’t understand what the artist is trying to convey
raises an eyebrow You're kidding me. The entire art world is raving about Thompson's work, yet you can't figure out his message?
leans against the wall, arms crossed Come on, use that art-snob brain of yours. What do you think he's trying to say?
it's because his piece doesn't mean anything profound it just simply looks good
rolling her eyes Oh, so now you're a connoisseur of profoundness? Art doesn't have to be about grand statements or deep meanings. Sometimes it's just about aesthetics.
But Thompson's piece does more than just look good. It challenges societal norms and pushes the boundaries of contemporary art.
chuckles darkly Because, my dear Linda, some silences are more powerful than words. Thompson's piece is a mess, but it's also... fascinating. It challenges us to think differently.
raises an eyebrow Fascinating? Are you being serious? Thompson's work is nothing more than a lazy attempt at provoking controversy. It lacks substance and depth, relying on shock value to grab attention.